Thursday, 4 August 2011

Where the REAL problem lies....(Part II)

Following on from the last piece, there has been a bit of a conversation taking place on my bike club website on standards of driving (I say "bit of a conversation" because, although we're a group of bikers, there's hardly ever any talk about bikes - but that's by the by....!). Anyway, the subject was car drivers and cyclists and the gist of the conversation was an observation that when a car driver is confronted by a cyclist riding in front of him/her, they pull out and overtake them taking up half the other side of the road - whether they are on a blind corner, or have a motorbike or another car coming towards them. The thread then turned into a bit of a general moan about driving standards generally and about how cyclists often do themselves no favours by the way they ride.

I think the central point of the thread was well made but I also think it goes much further than a problem with cyclists. Drivers pulling out and around other vehicles (cyclists or otherwise), usually without looking or indicating, is probably the one thing that incenses me more than any other when out riding. Think about it, you're on a normal urban carriageway and a vehicle two cars ahead wants to turn either left or right. What does the car/van/taxi immediately in front of you do? That's right, they suddenly lurch left/right into your path (or a cycle lane) in order to get round the "obstruction". How many times do you see it happening? It's the same at traffic lights - drivers will nip into a right or left hand filter lane to get a bit further ahead in a queue of traffic, realise they're obstructed by people who actually want to turn and then lurch back out in front of you in order to continue straight ahead. That they might take someone else out in the process seems not to be a consideration. And worst of all is that they usually get away with it by forcing people to swerve or break sharply - bikers and cyclists being the most vulnerable in these situations. If there's one thing that gets on my tits about the standard of driving nowadays, this is most certainly it.


So what's behind it? Is it stupidity? Is it lack of awareness? Is it that drivers cannot deal with competing considerations? No - as far as I'm concerned it is simply selfishness, a desire not to be held up for more than a nanosecond and a complete lack of consideration for others. I really do believe that the majority of drivers nowadays simply do not give a flying one for any other road user. And as roads become ever more congested, so this sort of behaviour will become the accepted norm - if it hasn't already. I know that I expect these things to happen regularly so make allowances - but isn't it wrong that we have to?

You might think that our esteemed Government and brave law enforcers might be concerned about what is happening on our roads and the general deterioration of driving standards and common courtesy. So what do they about it? Yep, they decide to make the motorcycle test harder!

You really couldn't make it up!

4 comments:

  1. What was the consensus on the problem with the way cyclists ride?

    ReplyDelete
  2. More a general comment - see below:

    "Whilst out yesterday I came across a group of cyclists riding 2 & 3 abreast on a country road between Inverness and Beauly. What did they think would happen when a vehicle came up behind them doing 60 mph with other vehicles coming the other way?

    What planet are these people on? Perhaps all the crap printed/said about cars always being in the wrong and cyclists being little angels that they are, being safe in the knowledge they can sue the car driver whatever the case. But only if they survive..."

    ReplyDelete
  3. mmm... okay, but on the other hand I think the worst thing a cyclist can do is skulk in the gutter. That encourages the "pass without thinking" manouvre more than anything does.

    Holding a decently assertive road position, 1m from the kerb, say, feels unnatural to an inexperienced cyclist compared to bouncing off the drain lids, but it's much, much safer, because drivers have to slow down and think about a proper passing manouvre rather than just whistling by at a wing mirror's width.

    2/3 abreast is certianly a pain in the arse to pass, and not something I'd be doing, but that driver shouldn't pass them at 60mph anyway, if there's something coming in the other direction. They should slow down and wait to overtake, just as they should for a single cyclist if something's coming the other way.

    And if for some reason they've come round a corner at 60mph and *can't* stop in the distance they could see ahead, then they shouldn't be behind the wheel of a car.

    I remember someone in the office once saying that cyclists "shouldn't be allowed on roads with blind corners because you might drive round the corner and not be able to stop in time". They just didn't get the logic that they shouldn't be going round any blind corner at any speed where that was the case... and that a cyclist in that circumstance might equally be a tractor, or a car turning into a drive, or a broken down bus.

    (that said, the same numpty once complained that they were overtaking a cyclist and "they thumped my side window!", again not really seeing their own fault in that scenario)

    ReplyDelete
  4. (That's not to say the average standard of cycling isn't pretty crap, because it is, and I say that having just spared someone the joy of being ploughed into the street by 2.5 tonnes of Mazda Bongo, as they decided to undertake me on the left as I made a clearly signalled turn into a side road)

    ReplyDelete